I watched ‘Children of Men’ again tonight. I bought the DVD a while back.
I sometimes latch on to movies and watch them semi-obsessively (or fully so). ‘Harold and Maude’ was one. ‘Forbidden Planet’ was one, ‘The Wicker Man,’ too (the 1973 version, not the recent remake, with a preference for the ‘extended version’ that was the original cut sent to distributors as promo). See?
I’m not sure why I pick the ones I do. Maybe the movie comes along at the right time, or maybe something transcendental is lurking behind these films, trying to show itself to me. I don’t really know. Sometimes I think I’m going to write a screenplay. A remake of ‘Forbidden Planet’ has been brewing in my brain for a while, but I doubt it’ll ever make it to paper. Mostly I think this talk of being productive is a conceit, because really I’m just guided by mysterious motives I don’t quite understand, and might one day figure out. Just like everybody, except maybe moreso.
Autism. Obsessive behavior. Who’da thought?
But ‘Children of Men’… I could go on and on about it. There are just so many ways of approaching it; it’s like dream interpretation of the near future. It always makes me cry, and maybe that’s the attraction. “Sad fugee face…”
I’ve been doing some dilletantish reading on the Ni-Mee-Poo or Nez Perce. Mostly the biggest chase scene in history, across half a continent. Within the next couple weeks I’ll be driving most of the western half of it, or at least the part you can get to without leaving your car. I had planned this route for other reasons, mainly having to do with primitive hot springs and my desire to spend as much time as possible in the mountains of Idaho. But you start clicking around on Google Earth and you find things, like Big Hole.
Big Hole: Sad fugee face. Major battle. Lots of dead people. National Historic Monument. Near a town called Wisdom. We like irony, especially when it’s in Montana, so we must drive there. Lost Creek Pass out of the Bitterroot Mountains, down to the Big Hole and the far-reaching headwaters of the Missouri River… Ironically (again) this is where I’ll leave the trail. So let me back up.
Northeastern Oregon and Idaho. I’ll miss the origin of the trail, where Chief Joseph and his cohorts took off, refusing to be sent to a reservation. I’ve been to that area (the magnificent Wallowa valley), but I didn’t know this piece of its history.
I’ll pick up the trail in the… It cracks me up every time I think about it. There’s a Lewiston, ID, and a Clarkston, WA. They’re on opposite sides of the mighty Snake River at the confluence with the Clearwater. Lewiston and Clarkston. Everywhere you look in this region, there’s a town named after Lewis and Clark in some way. Lewis County and Clark County. You can’t escape it. I had an idea where I’d write a thing about all the places named for Lewis and Clark, but I bet someone’s already done that.
But US 12 goes through these Lewish and Clarkian towns on the mighty Snake, and so will I. The Nez Perce National Historical Trail passes near there, and there are many parks and markers along US 12 to inform the curious traveler.
Sometimes I think that being able to gain a cursory understanding of the history of conflict by reading a plaque by the road is utterly wrong. Like it’s insipid. Morally wrong. It doesn’t communicate anything real. Of course there was a war here… What do you expect? Some people say you repeat history if you don’t understand it, but I have these thoughts about war… I think that understanding war is why we fight them. We innoculate ourselves with understanding. We under-prepare ourselves by thinking about it, then go out and do it, and bemoan the result. Not to say that history is worthless, just that we don’t feel it, and if we do, we cut off the feeling with blame. ‘Those goddamned Indians should have stayed on their reservation!’
See, I have this theory that war is as intrinsic to human nature as anything else we do. We don’t like to think that we’re warlike, or that we’re violent. But we are. There has always been war, and I don’t think there’s any reason to assume there won’t be in the future. War is a social reflex. It will happen if there is the capability for it to happen. Being at war might mean the loss of one’s innocence or one’s soul, but it’s not necessarily the loss of one’s humanity, for one simple reason: Human beings fight wars.
And for more evidence: Even as US 12 simultaneously marks and erases the rebellion of Chief Joseph et al, it passes through a town called Kooskia. And at Kooskia, between 1942 and 1945 inclusive, close to 300 American citizens of Japanese descent were interned. All that remains at this date is a field. The prison camp removed from existence and almost forgotten. However, US 12 does not erase their story; it is their story. They built the road through the mountains, the road I want to drive for pleasure.
The capability to fight war is the enabler. And, see, that’s the real problem, because in order to defend yourself from someone else who is only doing what comes naturally, you have to equip yourself (mentally, socially, materially) to fight. In order to fight no more forever (as the man says), we have to completely give up.
There’s an image from Arthurian legend, where one of the knights can only save himself by removing his armor. It’s a common image, too, taking off the armor in order to gain the flexibility required to solve the real problem. We have to give up, not in the sense of surrender, but to have no need to surrender.
OK. Enough rambling. I’ll be completely embarassed reading this tomorrow.